InstituteOfScience.com
Copyright
2009 S.H. Shakman, Institute Of Science; all rights reserved.
MULTIPLE
SCLEROSIS - ITS CAUSE AND THERAPY
– by Stuart-Hale Shakman PhD (History)
InstituteOfScience.com
(first
drafted circa
1995 as per appendix; revisited 2004, Sept 29 2009, published Dec 4
2009)
1. OVERVIEW/BACKGROUND RE
ROSENOW’S WORK
ON MS
2. IN BLACK AND WHITE: THE DENTAL - OPTIC NEURITIS - MS CONNECTION
a. DENTAL INFECTION AS A CAUSE OF OPTIC NEURITIS
(1) BLACK
(2) CONTEMPORARY SUPPORT
(3) CONTEMPORARY NON-SUPPORTED NON-SUPPORT
(4) WHITE
b.THE OPTIC NEURITIS - MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS CONNECTION
c. IF ORAL INFECTION CAUSES OPTIC NEURITIS, WHICH LEADS
TO MS,
DOESN'T THIS MEAN: ORAL INFECTION LEADS TO MS???
3.
APPENDIX: MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS LITERATURE UPDATES: GOING NOWHERE
SLOWLY
1. OVERVIEW/BACKGROUND RE
ROSENOW’S WORK ON MS
Overview of related works by E.C. Rosenow MD (author of
300+ articles 1902-1958 as per Index Medicus; head of experimental
bacteriology
at the Mayo Foundation from 1915-1944).
Dr. Rosenow's studies included multiple
sclerosis (MS) as early as 1916, but he paid particular attention to it
in his
later years, presenting evidence of having established an etiologic
relationship with an organism consistently isolated from nasopharynx
and
infected oral “foci”, i.e., infections in tonsils and in and around
teeth, and
concluding that MS was due to a non-hemolytic neurotropic streptococcic
infection or intoxication emanating from such oral foci.
In his last 2 published articles, both of
which referred to MS and the last also to ALS (amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis),
Rosenow emphasized the use of intradermal injections of both autogenous
streptococcic vaccine and thermal antibody.
These were to be continued over an indefinite period presumably
due to the
continued presence of foci implicated in his earlier studies, although
these
last articles did not contain specific reference to these oral foci or
the
concept of "focal infection".
Thus, notably absent from Rosenow's last two
works (1957-8) was reference to the need to remove these infected
(oral)
foci. On the one hand we may speculate
that this absence was due not to abandonment of the importance
of this
principle, but rather so as to not cast a possibly injurious shadow on
the
independently-favorable results obtained with vaccine alone
(particularly in
its form as thermal antibody. However,
insofar as Rosenow's definitive animal experiments and a range of
additional
supporting, reproducible and irrefutable experiments, the combination
of
removal of foci in conjunction with vaccine and antibody appear to be
indicated
as the most prudent course of action.
It would appear that Rosenow may have grown
somewhat "battle weary" on the subject of oral focal infection, and
perhaps partly in reaction had developed therapeutic methods which were
effective
even if the offending foci were not removed.
In other words, to use a boxing analogy, even with one hand tied
behind
his back - his best and early sure-knockout punch (removal of causative
oral
foci), Rosenow managed to develop a strategy which reportedly could
keep the
pathogen in check. Of course, the
effectiveness of these therapeutic methods further validate his work
identifying the source of the offending organisms as those oral foci
from which
they have been obtained and made into effective therapeutic substances.
Of Rosenow's regimen for MS, it is noted that
his administration of vaccine twice weekly is in agreement with
Florence
Sabin's assessment that antibody is produced for about 3 days following
injection. In discussing long-term
vaccine-therapy
for MS, Dr. Rosenow described a schedule of subcutaneous injections of
up to 1
ml of vaccine weekly and up to 2 ml of "thermal streptococcic
antibody" twice weekly or daily: “
One-half milliliter of the stock or autogenous [multiple
sclerosis]
thermal streptococcic antibody from 10 billion streptococci per
milliliter was injected separately subcutaneously, but at the same time
or more
often (as vaccine), if favorable results ensued. This
dose was increased to 2 ml. and was
given twice weekly or daily, provided local reactions at the point of
injection
were minimal or negative and provided clinical results were favorable.
… Since
such injections were harmless and had to be repeated over long periods,
some
member of the family or a nurse was instructed to give the
injections."
2. IN BLACK AND
WHITE: THE DENTAL - OPTIC NEURITIS - MS
CONNECTION
Wholly independent of Rosenow and the general
"cause of MS" literature, the indirect link between oral infections
and MS seems firmly established, via optic neuritis; i.e., oral foci,
or dental
infections, are known to cause optic neuritis; and optic neuritis is a
precursor to MS.
a. DENTAL INFECTION AS A CAUSE OF
OPTIC NEURITIS
(1) BLACK
Black, 1913, summarized and listed some 41 articles
from the early dental literature, from 1839 to 1912, which had
discussed the
apparent causal relation between diseases of the teeth and diseases of
the
eye. Black refers to various eye and ear
ailments, including optic neuritis and even loss of sight, which were
cured by
dental treatment. (See 13T1-13T41) Two of these were cited by Black as relating
to the subject of optic neuritis, McConachie 1903 and Allport 1904. [see FOCAL INFECTION CHRON FILE, McConachie
1903, Allport 1904, Black 1913.
(2)
CONTEMPORARY SUPPORT
A
number of recent articles accessed through MEDLINE clearly support this
correlation between dental infection and optic neuritis.
For example:
Bocca etal (1989) discussed possible interactions between
ophthalmic and
dental pathologies. Ilewicz etal. (1990)
demonstrated relations between oral foci and diseases of the eye
(intraocular
and retrobulbar optic neuritis, iritis, retinitis and keratitis) with
positive
electrocutaneous pulp viability test results in 31 of 43 patients. Chaabouni etal. (1991) reported improvement
in 3 of 4 optic neuritis patients with treatment of acute dental
infection
first and, secondly, association of corticosteroids.
Philippe, etal., (1993) discussed the case of
23-year-old woman with unilateral acute edematous optic neuritis which
recovered on removal of a nasolabial cyst of probable dental origin.
(3) CONTEMPORARY NON-SUPPORTED
NON-SUPPORT
The prominent
editor (N.
R. Miller) of the authoritative contemporary ophthalmology text
(Walsh
and Hoyt, 1982, p. 238-241), on the one hand recognizes the
established
connection between optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis: "... optic
neuritis may occur at any time during the course of well-documented
multiple
sclerosis .... in many instances the conclusion that a syndrome of
progressive
optic neuropathy does exist in patients with multiple sclerosis seems
inescapable." Miller refers to a
number of "disorders that have been associated with an anterior optic
neuritis", including herpes zoster, ulcerative colitis, peptic ulcer
disease, post-infectious encephalomyelitis, measles, rubella, chicken
pox,
influenza, lymphatic meningitis, poliomyelitis, coxsackie virus
infection,
psittacosis and infectious mononucleosis; and disorders which have been
associated
with retrobulbar optic neuropathy, including syphilis, diphtheria,
scarlet
fever, encephalomyelitis, petrussis, mumps, measles, and infectious
mononucleosis. Miller also notes that
"Both anterior and retrobulbar forms of optic neuritis have been
reported
after various vaccinations", including anti-rabies, smallpox, combined
smallpox, tetanus and diphtheria, combined measles, mumps and rubella,
bivalent
influenza and swine influenza.
However, Miller dismisses the concept of a
relation between oral focal infection and optic neuritis, referring
erroneously
to Leon E. White's 1928 article as having disproved it:
"Early approaches to the treatment of
optic neuritis concentrated on a search for a focus of infection,
particularly
with respect to the paranasal sinuses, tonsils and teeth.
White (1928) examined a group of patients
with optic neuritis who had had a variety of operative procedures
directed at
these organisms and found that their prognosis was identical with that
of
patients with untreated optic neuritis." [Miller, 1982, p. 243] Mr. Miller has obviously not read White
(1928), nor Black (1913), nor other relevant materials.
(4) WHITE
Whereas, the White article ("Location of
Focus in Optic Nerve Disturbances", 1928) was actually an enthusiastic
endorsement of Rosenow's work as concerns the relation between eye
diseases and
non‑vital teeth and infected tonsils, and was critical only of an
irresponsible fad of needless sinus operations, which fad seems to have
preceded
and been independent of the "oral sepsis/focal infection/elective
localization progression. Talk about
sloppy research, here's the authoritative book in the field of
ophthalmology,
and it's just plain giving out 100% 180-degree WRONG information. Lord help us all.
b. THE
OPTIC NEURITIS - MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS CONNECTION
As mentioned above, while Miller somehow
denies the oral/optic connection (perhaps not wanting to be rendered
obsolete
by a dentist), he does acknowledge optic neuritis as a precursor of MS. Unquestionable acceptance of this
relationship continues to the present time.
For example, Beck, RW etal, in the New England Journal of
Medicine,
Dec. 9, 1993, reported that optic neuritis patients treated with
steroids were
found to have lowered rates for developing M.S. within two years;
however it
was noted that the effects of steroid shots eventually wears off. [as
reported
in Science News 144, Dec. 11, 1993, wherein is stated
"optic
neuritis, a symptom associated with M.S.]
Mapelli, etal, 1991, p. 117-121, in an
article entitled "Progression of Optic Neuritis to Multiple Sclerosis:
A
prospective study in an Italian population", reported development of MS
in
10 of 40 optic neuritis patients followed for 12 years.
Seven of these ten developed MS within 2 years.
The authors summarize reported the risk of ON
leading to MS as found in other studies to vary greatly, from 11.5 to
85% in
U.S. and European studies, and from 8.3 to 27% in Japanese studies.
Slamowits and Macklin, 1991, p. 47, refer to
"increasing evidence that optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis have a
higher degree of association (perhaps 80%) than previously thought (as
low as
11%)."
Frenkel etal, 1991, p. 49, refer to Risso and
Lessell's 1988 [Neurology 38:185-190] retrospective
covering 15
years following diagnosis of optic neuritis, wherein 74% of females
(average
7.2 years) and 34% males (average 10.4 years) developed multiple
sclerosis.
Adams 1989, p. 105, "The optic pathway
is involved in most MS patients, estimated by Lumsden (1970) at 93
percent of
cases and by Ulrich and Groebke-Lorenz (1983) at 100 percent of cases. Surprisingly only 44 percent of patients in
the latter study had had clinical optic neuritis."
Mims 1983 [Mims, Cedric, New Scientist,
30 June 1983, 938-40, "Multiple Sclerosis, the case against
viruses."] p. 938, on Multiple
Sclerosis: "It often begins with misty vision or other eye trouble
(optic
neuritis) to be followed later by weakness in the limbs, numbness or
tingling
..."
A 1994 Johnson & Johnson Vision Products
advertisement features a mock eye-chart illustration, with "MS" on
the top line in large letters, "DIABETES" on the next line in
slightly smaller letters, then "GLAUCOMA" on next line in next size,
then "CATARACTS", and finally on the bottom line in the smallest
letters "HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE".
The text states "By examining your eyes, your eye doctor may
detect
the early onset of diseases like diabetes, high blood pressure, and
multiple
sclerosis." The connection between
optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis would appear to be generally
accepted.
Hence the question must be asked and
emphasized:
c. IF ORAL INFECTION CAUSES OPTIC
NEURITIS, WHICH LEADS TO MS,
DOESN'T THIS MEAN: ORAL INFECTION LEADS
TO MS???
Let's try it again: If A causes B,
and B causes C, then it would
appear that A causes C. Call it math
(the "old" math) or call it logic, the fact is that oral focal
infection must be recognized as an etiological factor in multiple
sclerosis.
So what's new? Rosenow told us that
in 1916.
3. APPENDIX:
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS LITERATURE
UPDATES: GOING NOWHERE SLOWLY
SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF BELOW MATERIAL, TO END OF
THIS POST: "STILL GOING NOWHERE SLOWLY
For your
reading
enjoyment, following are excerpts, etc. from various discussions of MS
in the
medical literature through 1995, with emphasis on the suspected role of
infection,
and with occasional side-comments.
MS -
SIMILARITIES WITH
POLIO, MEASLES, ETC.
Sept. 1995: Waksman, BH, Nature 377,
Sept 1995, 105-6, More genes versus environment"
Waksman notes that Ebers, GC, etal, Nature
377, Sept. 14, 1995, 1550-151, seek to counter Kurtzke [JF, Clin.
Microbiol.
Rev. 6, 382-427 (1993)] "and those sharing his view
that existing epidemiological data point to a specific infectious
(presumably
viral) agent as a direct cause of MS. No
such agent has ever been successfully linked to MS ..., either by
direct
isolation or by indirect (for example, serological) means, despite
claims for
some twenty different viruses. ...
"The situation in MS is reminiscent of
that in poliomyelitis ... The incidence of neurological disease
increases in
individuals of higher socioeconomic status within a population (because
this
tends to be associated with viral transmission delayed to late
childhood or
early adolescence) and in populations living at temperate latitudes ...
. A similar requirement in MS for late
viral
transmission has been demonstrated in a well controlled,
population-based study
that showed an almost tenfold increase in the risk of contracting Ms as
the age
(up to puberty) of infection with common childhood viruses (such as
measles)
increased."
[Byron
Waksman, Dept. of
Pathology, NYU, 300 East
54th
St., New York, Ny 10022, USA.
VIRAL ANTIGENS, POSSIBLE INVOLVEMENT OF
Steinman, L., Nature 375, 29
June 1995, 739-40, "Multiple Sclerosis - Presenting an odd
autoantigen":
p. 739 "The identification of key antigens in human autoimmune diseases
is
a crucial step towards the development of specific intervention." p. 801: "MS lesions may develop if
pro-inflammatory
factors - including the autoantigen itself - accumulate locally beyond
a
threshold of control as a result of stress-producing events such as
local
immune responses to viral antigens."
[van Noort JM, etal, Nature 375, 29 June 1995,
739;
798-801, "The small heat-shock protein aB-crystallin as
candidate
autoantigen in multiple sclerosis"]
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION PROPOSED,
EMPHASIS AUTOLOGOUS
1995:
Burt RK, W Burns, A Hess, Bone Marrow Transplantation 16
(1995), 1-5, "Bone marrow transplantation for multiple sclerosis",
note that "Total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) has been used to treat
several
presumed autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic
lupus
erythematosus, chronic inflammatory demylinating polyneuropathy and MS. In each of these cases, TLI is palliative,
not curative, presumably due to incomplete ablation of the immune
system."
[We note that these same conditions were
addressed by Rosenow and by autohemotherapy]
For MS patients with a poor prognosis, the
authors propose an aggressive course of action "such as complete immune
ablation and hemapoietic stem cell rescue." This
"is designed to ablate an aberrant
immune system and then .. reconstitute a new immune system." (p. 2)
The authors note that
-- in
animal models "it is of interest that unmanipulated autologous marrow
is as
effective in maintaining remission as allogeneic or syngenic
hematopoietic stem
cell support." (p. 2)
--
"Although infrequently reported, patients with a coincidental
autoimmune disease who undergo BMT for other reasons have durable
remissions of
their autoimmune disorder. For instance,
patients with psoriasis or ulcerative colitis have maintained long-term
clinical remissions arfter allogeneic BMT for leukemia." (p.3)
--
"... the mechanism by which marrow transplantation could induce
a
durable remission in patients with a regenerating immune system is
unclear." Some possible
explanations are offered, including considerations which would give a
preferential advantage to autologous BMT.
-- the
mortality of autologous BMT for breast cancer or solid tumors of 3-5%
or less,
and for T-cell-depleted allogeneic BMT of less than 20%.
--
"Animal studies from three separate institutions suggest that
BMT
may be beneficial."
INTERFERON FOR "RELAPSING,
REMITTING" MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
October 1994:
Some 8 decades after Dr. Rosenow's initial studies of this
condition, it
was estimated that more than a quarter million Americans have MS. About half of these cases were of a
"relapsing, remitting" type, progression of which had reportedly been
halted in 80% of patients given interferon, vs 65% of patients given a
placebo.
[Los Angeles Times 11 Oct 94, p. A22.]
Unfortunately this leaves the remainder, 20%
of group A and 35% of group B, still falling deeper into the
devastating grasp
of this insidious, chronic disease. And
100% of both groups which might be able to abort the cause of the
syndrome
altogether through the elimination of the causative foci, in most cases
probably diseased or non-vital teeth (as seemingly conclusively
demonstrated by
Rosenow); or at a minimum to control its progression through
subcutaneous
injections of autologous "antigen" and "antibody, ideally in
combination with removal of oral foci of infection.
MS AND RETROVIRUS
Waksman 1989 [Byron H. Waksman, Nature
337 (16 Feb. 1989), "Multiple Sclerosis, Relation to a
Retrovirus?"] discusses the "pathogenesis of the characteristic
inflammatory destructive lesions of MS, rheumatoid arthritis,
insulin-dependent
diabetes, chronic thyroiditis, and other similar diseases [which] is
explained
by many as an immunological reaction to tissue antigen triggered by
viral
infection (measles, rubella, Epstein-Barr virus) in early life in
genetically
predisposed individuals."
p. 104, "The evidence that MS in
susceptible individuals is initiated by viral infection, at least in
some
cases, is increasingly persuasive. For
the epidemic in the Faeroe Islands that followed the arrival of British
troops
in 1940, it seems that approximately two years of exposure to the
putative
infectious agent was necessary and that the period from infection to
onset of
clinical disease was about 6 years (J. Kurtzke). Susceptibility
was low before puberty. ...
[MS elsewhere may be] associated with infections (measles, mumps,
rubella,
Epstein-Barr virus) caught significantly
later
in age than in HLA-matched controls (A Compston, O. Anderson)", from
2-5 weeks after infection the exacerbation rate was increased more than
three-fold.
p. 105, Waksman, "Hypothetical sequence
of pathogenic events in MS" lists as first in the "acute phase",
systemic virus infection (measles, variacella, influenza), and in the
middle of
the "chronic phase", "systemic virus infection - reactivation of
process."
Waksman relates that "more than 20
viruses have been incriminated as the possible cause of multiple
sclerosis
since 1946. ... Yet none of these candidates has stood the test of
time."
[see also AIDS/MS, KILLING COUSINS]
ASSOCIATION
OF ALS AND
MS
Confavreux C etal, "Association of
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and multiple sclerosis", Revue
Neurologique, 1993, 149(5):351-3, discussed a case first
diagnosed
as multiple sclerosis, which after a 10 year asymptomatic period,
exhibited
symptoms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
"Muscle weakness and atrophy increased in the limbs and the
bulbar
territority and the patient died nine months later.
The autopsy showed characteristic 'old'
plaques of multiple sclerosis in the cerebrum with anterior horn cell
and
pyramidal tracts degeneration, typical of amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis, in the
spinal cord. Although exceptional, this
association of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and multiple sclerosis
leads to
the discussion of an etiological immunological dysregulation common to
these
two diseases." [MEDLINE]
To the extent that Dr. Rosenow referred to
ALS, he had grouped it with MS due to similar results with strains from
these
diseases.
BLOOD FLUIDS
IMPLICATED
IN PATHOGENESIS OF MS
Scolding (1989), 620-2, "... complement
has ... been implicated in the pathogenesis both of multiple sclerosis
and
experimental allergic encephalomyelitis."
Of course this would also suggest that such blood fluids might
be commandeered
into an autogenous vaccine in the form of autohemotherapy.
MS AND
INFECTION
Scott 1985, p. 199, "Good evidence
suggests that MS is at least triggered by some sort of infection, and
the
viruses are the favoured candidates.
[Scott,
Andrew, Pirates
of the Cell, The Story of Viruses from Molecule to Microbe, Basil
Blackwell
Ltd., Oxford 1985]
Johnson 1985 [Johnson RT in Koetsier; Vinken,
PJ, etal., Handbook of Clinical Neurology, North Holland, 1985]
p.319,
"(1) epidemiological data have indicated
that MS is related primarily to environmental exposure in childhood
followed by
a long latency period."
(2) Studies in "other demyelinating
diseases have documented multiple mechanisms by which viruses can have
long
incubation periods...
(3) "studies in patients with MS have
consistently shown abnormal immune responses, particularly to viral
antigens."
p. 320, discusses the role of experimental
encephalitis as "the prototype autoimmune disease" and "since
the 1950s it has been studied as an experimental model of MS"
[apparently
due to the general (except Rosenow) failure to infect animals with MS]
and
discuss demyelinating acute encephalitis which occasionally follows
measles and
vaccina virus infections.
"Between 1967 and 1971, four chronic
neurological diseases proved to have viral etiologies.
The transmission of Kuru and
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and the recovery of viruses from subacute
sclerosing
parencephalitis and progressive multi-focal leukoencephalopathy led to
widespread speculation that MS would soon be transmitted or prove to
have
consistent viral recovery (Johnson 1975)
p. 320-1, Johnson discusses "uneven
geographical distribution of MS, with a decided north-south difference
in
prevalence. p. 321, For
example, per 100,000, there is an
incidence of 30-80 cases in Northern Europe and Northern U.S., vs. 6-20
in
Southern Europe and Southern U.S., vs. 1.0 in equatorial areas. These differences are not quite so
well-defined in the southern hemisphere.
There is a higher prevalence for women than for men, and for
whites over
blacks.
Studies in South Africa and Israel indicate
that persons migrating after age 15 carry the risk of birth place,
whereas
before that age they adopt the risk of their new home.
"Virtually all studies support the
relation to an early childhood exposure occurring betwen the ages of 10
and 15,
or the necessity of repeated exposures during childhood up to the age
of
puberty. This is followed by a latency
period of a number of years before the onset of clinical disease."
[sounds
just like the description of AIDS prior to learning the latent period
is not
latent; all signs point to Rosenow and oral foci].
p. 322, Johnson discusses apparent epidemics
of MS in the Faeroes between 1943 and 1960, following the British
occupation of
1940; and in Iceland a sudden rise in 1923 and again after 1944,
following
World War I occupation by Canadian Americans and British.
"These findings of apparent epidemics
suggest that MS is not only related to a childhood exposure but is
transmissible. ... The age of acquisition of an infection may influence
the
clinical manifestations.... Parallels between the epidemiology of MS
and
poliomyelitis have been made". [Pozkanzer etal, 1963]
[We are often reminded that Dr. Rosenow's
work involved a phases of related microorganisms in the causation of
both of
these neurological diseases.]
"In 3 case-controlled series the patients
with MS were found to have a history of measles at a later age
(Sullivan etal
1984). This is a particularly intriguing
finding, since the established late complication of measles virus
infection -
subacute sclerosing panencephalitis - is associated with infection
under 2
years of age."
p. 326, "One of the circumstantial
arguments for the viral etiology of MS is based on guilt by
association, since
several other human demyelinating diseases have established viral
etiologies", including postinfectious encephalomyelitis, subacute
sclerosing panencephalitis, and progressive multifocal
leukoencephalopathy.
p. 329, Immunological studies - more than 30
studies since 1962 have shown MS patients in contrast to controls to
have
higher levels of serum antibodies against measles, as well as
parainfluenza 3,
influenza C, variacella, herpes simplex, rubella and Epstein-Barr
viruses. Johnson cites other studies,
including one in
which "intrathecal antibody synthesis occurred to as many as eleven
different agents in the same patients (Salmi etal 1983).
These findings might suggest that multiple
viruses can cause MS ...."
329,
Johnson also points out, in seeming accordance with Rosenow,
that
"It is important to note that the finding of higher serum antibody
titers
to measles is not specific to MS.
Similar findings have been reported in lupus erythematosus,
Reithe's
syndrome, and chronic liver disease."
p. 330, "there are many claims of the
transmission of MS to primates and smaller animals, but none either
recovered a
characterizable virus or could be confirmed by other laboratories
(Innes and
Kurland 1952).
"The isolation of parainfluenza type I
virus from tissue culture derived from two patients dying of MSS has
been
pursued extensively and unsuccessfully."
Newmark, Peter, 1985,
"Even if a virus can be proved to be
implicated in MS, it is likely to be merely the initiator of a chain of
immunological events leading to demyelination of nerve fibres rather
than a
direct cause. It seems probable that the
initial viral infection somehow triggers an autoimmune reaction against
components of the myelin sheath of nerves."
However, Newmark indicates that it is not yet
"clear how the disease progresses from the triggering event."
MYELIN
Thoden van Velzen, 1984, notes that
Sznieielski 1979 [Sznieielski, S. etal, Toxicon 17,
363-371,
1979] showed that bacterial toxins might preferentially injure the
myelin
sheath thus interfering with nerve function.
DENTAL FOCI AND DISSEMINATED SCLEROSIS
Störtbecker 1967, p. 301, specifically
referred to the potential significance of bacterial products emanating
from
dental foci of infection in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis.
Johnson in Koetsier, Vol. 3, p. 329, "In
1962, Adams and Imagawa reported that complement-fixing and
neutralizing
antibody titers against measles virus were higher in patients with MS
than in a
control group [75% in MS patients vs. 00% in controls] ...findings have
been
confirmed in over 30 subsequent studies.
Other studies also have found higher levels of serum antibodies
against
parainfluenza, influenza C, varicella, herpes simplex, rubella, and
EBV. ...
These findings might suggest that multiple viruses can cause MS ..."
AUTOIMMUNE THEORY AND SUB-THEORIES
Mims 1983 [Mims, Cedric, New Scientist,
30 June 1983, 938-40, "Multiple Sclerosis, the case against
viruses."] p. 940: "It looks
mery much as if MS is a virus-induced auto-immune disease of the
nervous
system." Mims discusses four
possible ways "in which such cross-reacting immune responses could be
so
generated". [Certainly three, and
probably all four, are wrong, worthless, useless, fictional, imaginary.]
The discovery of two other 'slow' virus
diseases in the 1960s, subacute sclerosing panencephalitis and
progressive
multifocal leucoencephalopathy were found to be caused by the measles
virus and
a polymavirus respectively, plus evidence that MS is caused by
childhood
infection, "were an immense stimulus to M.S. research."
p. 939, "Between the mid-1960s and 1980
scientists recovered no fewer than 9 different viruses or virus-like
agents,
including herpes simplex, parainfluenza virus I, measles, and
coronavirus from
MS brains. Unfortunately none of this
work has proved to be repeatable. ... A guilty virus would offer the
prospect
of a vaccine to prevent the disease."
Subsequently, Almo Salmi and colleagues in
Finland "charted antibody responses to 16 common viruses in the serum
and
CSF of MS patients, and concluded that a given patient might synthesize
antibodies to as many as eleven different viruses in his brain. In addition some patients synthesized
antibodies to other common microbial antigens such as mycoplasma
pneumoniae or
diptheria and tetanus toxoids. ...
"The most likely explanation of these
antibody observations is that early in the disease ... antibody
producing cells
circulating in the blood very occasionally enter areas of the brain"
through a presumably temporary breakdown in the blood-brain barrier. Free from the immune control presumably
normally exerted on them in the blood, this according to Mims, "the
antibody forming cells synthesize whatever antibody they are programmed
to
synthesize", e.g. those associated with childhood disease.... antibody
producing cells are also present in the inflamed brains of patients
suffering
from mumps or measles encephalitis, but nearly all of them, which
arrived from
the blood, are producing antibody in response to the presence of the
infecting
virus. In contrast, the antibodies in MS
patients appear to be formed as an accidental result of the disease
process,
and not because the viruses are actually present in the brain."
[Thank the good lord that antibodies are
" formed as an accidental result of the disease process" or we'd all
be long gone.]
p. 938, DISEASE WAITING FOR INFECTION, OR
WHAT? Mims speculates, "The cause
of MS may not be a mystery much longer.
Although there is probably no specific MS virus, MS may well
result when
antibodies to other viruses enter the brain."
Innes 1952,
p.
574, cites
"several diseases of established micro-organismal origin"
which also fail to show symptoms generally typical of bacterial or
viral
diseases through much of their course, e.g. lues, leprosy and certain
phases of
tuberculosis and brucellosis.
p. 575, Incidence: "3 to 4 times as
many cases were found
in selected cities of Canada and northern U.S. as in comparable cities
of the
southern U.S."
p. 575 That MS may occur more frequently
among members of the same family than expected by chance "might
indicate
some genetic predisposition rather than interfamilial infection..."
p.
577, discussing negative results of
attempts to experimentally transmit MS, cites efforts by Rothfield,
Freund and
Hornowski (1920) who injected blood and CSF from four cases of MS in
rabbits
and guinea pigs: "Many died, but
the cause of death was diagnosed to be either coccoidiosis or
tuberculosis..."; Teage (1921) as reported by Cornwall (1936), likewise
observed coccoidiosis in rabbits and pneumonia in guinea pigs after
injections
of blood and CSF from MS patients.
p. 579, In discussing positive results, Behr
1924 reported successful transmission in rabbits with washings from the
ethmoids, on the assumption that retrobulbar neuritis, a frequent
finding in
MS, might be due to an infectious pathway through the nasal passages
and
ethmoids.
p. 588, concludes that "... the virus
hypothesis is still neither proved nor disproved ...; even if a virus
were
found, it might not evoke in animals a disease exactly like MS."
mail@InstituteOfScience.com
©2009 InstituteOfScience/SHShakman