InstituteOfScience.com
DEXTROSE-BRAIN BROTH MEDIUM 34R3 --"...cultures made by usual methods ... may yield the easily cultivable saprophytic organisms, including streptococci, instead of the highly sensitive, disease-producing strains. ... Special mediums, such as dextrose-brain broth and dextrose-brain agar, which afford reduced oxygen tension and other favorable conditions for growth, are essential in the primary culture in many diseases to insure isolation of the really causative streptococci." [34R3] STREPTOCOCCUS V.S. VIRUS IN COMMON COLD AND INFLUENZA 34R3-403 "It is becoming more generally recognized, despite the demonstrated importance of the 'virus' factor, especially in colds, that the more serious manifestations referable to the respiratory tract and remote tissues, incident to epidemic colds and influenza, are due to visible, cultivable organisms, chiefly streptococci, and more rarely to Bacillus influenzae and staphylococci. The results of studies on cataphoresis and virulence [and with vaccines indicate] ... that these streptococci are more often of primary than of secondary importance." [34R3, p. 403] VACCINE PREPARATION DETAILS, ETC. 34R3, p. 408 "In this study the vaccines used for prophylactic and active immunization against colds and influenza were prepared from the respective streptococci by adding enough of the dense suspension in glycerin-salt solution to 0.85 per cent sodium chloride solution to bring the density to that of the dextrose-brain broth culture, or approximately 2 billion streptococci per cc. The suspensions were heated to 75 degrees C for one hour, in vials of a capacity of 30cc., sealed with perforated screw-caps containing a rubber disk; the vials were completely immersed in water. For prophylactic inoculation, 0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 cc. were injected subcutaneously, a week apart, and then one injection of 1.0 cc was given once a month throughout the season when colds and influenza are prevalent. The dosage for children was reduced according to age. If the reactions proved too severe for hypersensitive patients the dosage was reduced according to the degree of reaction, but this was almost never necessary. For treatment, regardless of the duration or character of the respiratory manifestation, 0.3 cc of the vaccine was given subcutaneously as the initial injection; this was followed in 24 hours by 0.5 cc, and a day or 2 later by 1.0 cc subcutaneously, provided the reactions were not too severe and the patient's condition was improved or was no worse. In order to facilitate absorption as much as possible, the area of subcutaneous injection was massaged immediately, and the patient was instructed to massage it once or twice daily for three or four days following injection ... regardless of the degree of local reaction." [34R3, p. 408] SYMPTOMLESS FOCI, IMPORTANCE OF - TAKE II [34R5-721] "Lucas, in an extended study, reported that 319 of 364 patients having symptoms of various diseases, in many of whom inadequate consideration of foci had previously been given, were relieved from symptoms after thorough eradication of foci of infection in the dental area. Streptococci were isolated from nearly all of these foci, which included the remnants of the enamel organ of unerupted teeth. Vaccines, even though specific, have only limited value when given to patients without removal of evident foci."[721] [Lucas, C.D., "Periapical Infection", Dental Cosmos 71: 555-564, June 1929].[Go to ROSENOW Bibliography]